Skip to main content
B2B SaaS · 230 people

Lumenly

We replaced four contracts with one — and we'd do it again on a Friday.
VP of Marketing Ops · LumenlyIllustrative scenario

4 → 1

annual SaaS contracts ([market-leading CRM] + [marketing automation] + [CS platform] + [legacy consent vendor] → Pact)

↓ 62%

fully-loaded annual run rate

6 weeks

from kickoff to first live send on Pact

5 days → 5s

DPO answer time for an arbitrary contact's consent state

Background

Background.

A 230-person B2B SaaS company with three growth-stage funding rounds behind it and a roadmap pivot in the rear-view mirror. The revenue team ran on a [market-leading CRM] (≈140 seats), Marketing on a [market-leading marketing automation platform], Customer Success on a [market-leading CS platform], and Consent on a [legacy consent vendor]. Four annual contracts, three integration consultants on retainer, a nineteen-page consent flow diagram pinned to the privacy team's office that no one understood end-to-end.

The internal RevOps team had grown to seven people. Six of them spent their week on the seams between the products — sync reconciliation, dashboard re-baselining, suppression-list catch-up.

Challenge

Challenge.

Three things came due in the same quarter: the CRM renewal, a CCPA expansion to two new states, and a board-level efficiency target. The board's number was unambiguous: 30% reduction in SaaS spend by end of fiscal year. Without losing a single revenue capability.

The RevOps team modelled the gap. Renegotiating each vendor independently got to 12%. Cutting features got to 18% — at the cost of marketing capabilities the CMO had just spent two years building. The remaining 12 points were going to need a structural change.

Solution

Solution.

The team trialed Pact alongside the existing stack for four weeks. The Pact tenant imported their existing CRM schema unmodified — accounts, contacts, opportunities, custom objects, owner history — and stood up sequences, journeys, and a consent center against the same data. The DPO walked through the consent center and immediately spotted three lawful-basis records that had been hand-maintained for years; the audit chain told her where they came from.

Migration ran over a long weekend. Schema mapping was scripted; the dry-run report showed zero record loss and 27 reconciliation findings (all stale marketing-platform dupes that pre-dated the migration). The team kept the legacy CRM and marketing platform running in read-only mode for two weeks post-cutover, then turned them off.

The cost story: Pact Scale at 140 seats came in at $334k/year list, against $873k/year list for the prior four vendors combined. Even with the negotiated discounts the team had on the existing contracts, the new annual run rate dropped 62%.

Result

Result.

Six weeks from kickoff to first live send. The DPO's audit prep time dropped from five days to five seconds; the consent center now answers any contact's consent state from one screen. The RevOps team's headcount didn't shrink — but five of the seven people moved off plumbing and onto pipeline analytics, attribution modeling, and forecast tooling.

The integration consultants moved on to other clients. The nineteen-page consent flow diagram came off the wall.

Try Pact free. Upgrade when it pays for itself.

The stories above are illustrative composites of design-partner deployments. Run your own numbers with the live calculator, or talk to sales for a real quote.